Skip to content
L/

Global law library

The AI and data laws your product meets.

47 laws and frameworks across the EU, UK, US, India, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and the Americas, each with its scope, status and the move a founder should make.

RH / FOUNDATIONS FOR WHAT COMES NEXT
The architecture of trustrh. / studio notes

Browse the shelves

A visual index to the collection

Region
Topic
Status

Showing 47 of 47

EU · AIPhasing in

EU AI Act

Bans and AI literacy Feb 2025 · GPAI Aug 2025 · Transparency Aug 2026 · High-risk Dec 2027 / Aug 2028

The first comprehensive AI law, regulating AI by risk level: banned practices, high-risk systems, transparency duties and general-purpose AI models.

Applies to

Providers and deployers of AI systems placed on the EU market or whose outputs are used in the EU, wherever they are based.

Key obligations

  • Avoid prohibited practices and support AI literacy among staff
  • Transparency for chatbots, deepfakes and synthetic content
  • Risk management, data governance, logging and oversight for high-risk AI

Founder move

Classify each AI feature by role and risk tier, and plan around the deferred high-risk dates.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
EU · PrivacyIn force

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Applies since 25 May 2018 · Digital Omnibus amendments under negotiation

The EU’s data protection law and the global reference point for privacy regulation, with extraterritorial reach.

Applies to

Organisations established in the EU, and those outside it that offer goods or services to, or monitor, people in the EU.

Key obligations

  • A lawful basis and transparency for every processing activity
  • Data subject rights, DPIAs, records and breach notification within 72 hours
  • Safeguards for transfers outside the EU

Founder move

Map processing, roles and transfers; appoint an EU representative if you have no EU establishment.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2016/679
EU · PlatformsIn force

Digital Services Act (DSA)

Fully applicable since 17 Feb 2024

Rules for online intermediaries and platforms on illegal content, transparency, advertising and user protection, with the heaviest duties on very large platforms.

Applies to

Intermediary services offered to users in the EU, from hosting to marketplaces and social platforms.

Key obligations

  • Notice-and-action for illegal content and statements of reasons
  • Terms, advertising and recommender transparency
  • Protections for minors and bans on certain dark patterns

Founder move

If users can post, sell or share on your product, check which DSA tier you fall into.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2022/2065
EU · PlatformsIn force

Digital Markets Act (DMA)

Applies since 2 May 2023 · Gatekeeper obligations since Mar 2024

Competition-style obligations on designated gatekeepers, opening up app stores, messaging interoperability and data use.

Applies to

Designated gatekeepers, but it creates new rights and openings for startups that depend on them.

Key obligations

  • Gatekeepers may not self-preference or combine data without consent
  • Interoperability and side-loading openings
  • Business-user data access rights

Founder move

If you build on a gatekeeper platform, look for new access and interoperability rights you can use.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2022/1925
EU · PrivacyPhasing in

EU Data Act

Applies since 12 Sep 2025 · Design obligations for new products from Sep 2026

Rules on access to and use of data from connected products, cloud switching and unfair data-sharing terms.

Applies to

Makers of connected products and related services, data holders and cloud and data-processing providers.

Key obligations

  • Give users access to data generated by connected products
  • Remove barriers to switching cloud providers
  • Avoid unfair data-sharing terms with smaller businesses

Founder move

If you sell IoT, SaaS or cloud services in the EU, review data-access and switching terms.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2023/2854
EU · CyberIn force

NIS2 Directive

Transposition deadline 17 Oct 2024 · National laws rolling out

The EU’s baseline cybersecurity law for essential and important entities, covering risk management and incident reporting.

Applies to

Medium and large entities in listed sectors, including digital infrastructure, cloud, data centres and many digital providers.

Key obligations

  • Cybersecurity risk-management measures, including supply chain
  • Staged incident reporting (early warning within 24 hours)
  • Management accountability and training

Founder move

Check whether you, or your enterprise customers, are in scope; their duties flow down to vendors.

EUR-Lex · Directive (EU) 2022/2555
EU · CyberIn force

Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)

Applies since 17 Jan 2025

ICT risk, incident and third-party rules for the financial sector, including oversight of critical tech providers.

Applies to

EU financial entities, including crypto-asset service providers, and the ICT vendors that serve them.

Key obligations

  • ICT risk-management framework and resilience testing
  • Major ICT incident reporting
  • Mandatory contract terms with ICT third-party providers

Founder move

Selling to EU banks, insurers or CASPs? Expect DORA contract clauses in every deal.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2022/2554
EU · CyberPhasing in

Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)

Reporting from 11 Sep 2026 · Main obligations 11 Dec 2027

Security-by-design requirements for hardware and software products with digital elements sold in the EU.

Applies to

Manufacturers, importers and distributors of products with digital elements, including most commercial software.

Key obligations

  • Report actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents (24h / 72h / 14 days)
  • Secure-by-design development and vulnerability handling
  • Security updates for the support period and conformity assessment

Founder move

Set up vulnerability intake and reporting now; it already applies to products on the market.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2024/2847
EU · AIPhasing in

Product Liability Directive (revised)

Applies to products placed on the market from 9 Dec 2026

Modernised no-fault liability for defective products, now expressly covering software, including AI systems.

Applies to

Manufacturers of products and software, and in some cases importers, representatives and fulfilment providers.

Key obligations

  • Strict liability for damage caused by defective software
  • Liability can follow updates, upgrades and missing security patches
  • Disclosure of evidence and presumptions that ease claims

Founder move

Revisit liability caps, update policies and insurance for software sold into the EU.

EUR-Lex · Directive (EU) 2024/2853
EU · CryptoIn force

Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA)

Stablecoin rules Jun 2024 · Full application Dec 2024 · Transitional periods ending

A single EU framework for crypto-asset issuers and service providers, with authorisation and passporting.

Applies to

Issuers of crypto-assets and crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) serving EU clients.

Key obligations

  • CASP authorisation in one member state, then passporting
  • White papers and marketing rules for token offers
  • Reserve and redemption rules for stablecoins

Founder move

Map your activities to MiCA services before choosing a home member state.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2023/1114
EU · PrivacyPhasing in

European Health Data Space (EHDS)

In force Mar 2025 · Main obligations phase in from 2027

Rules for access to electronic health data for care and for research, innovation and policy (secondary use).

Applies to

Health data holders, EHR system makers and organisations seeking health data for secondary use.

Key obligations

  • Patient access and portability of electronic health data
  • Requirements for electronic health record systems
  • Permits through health data access bodies for secondary use

Founder move

Health-tech teams should plan data access and EHR interoperability into the roadmap.

EUR-Lex · Regulation (EU) 2025/327
UK · PrivacyPhasing in

UK GDPR & Data (Use and Access) Act 2025

Main reforms Feb 2026 · Complaints duty Jun 2026

The UK’s retained GDPR, updated by the DUAA with recognised legitimate interests, a new automated decision-making framework and transfer changes.

Applies to

Organisations processing personal data in the UK or targeting UK individuals.

Key obligations

  • Lawful basis, rights and accountability as under the GDPR
  • Safeguards for significant automated decisions
  • A data protection complaints procedure

Founder move

Don’t assume EU and UK rules are identical; check ADM, cookies and transfers separately.

Briefing · Kennedys on DUAA commencement
UK · PlatformsIn force

Online Safety Act 2023

Illegal harms duties Mar 2025 · Child safety duties Jul 2025

Duties on user-to-user and search services to tackle illegal content and protect children, enforced by Ofcom.

Applies to

Services with UK users that let people share content or interact, and search services, wherever based.

Key obligations

  • Illegal content risk assessments and safety measures
  • Children’s risk assessments and highly effective age assurance where required
  • Transparency and user reporting tools

Founder move

If UK children could use your product, complete the children’s access assessment.

legislation.gov.uk · Online Safety Act 2023
UK · AIGuidance

UK AI regulation (principles-based)

No horizontal AI statute as of Oct 2026

The UK regulates AI through existing regulators (ICO, CMA, FCA, Ofcom) applying cross-sector principles, rather than a single AI Act.

Applies to

AI products used in the UK, through each sector regulator’s existing powers.

Key obligations

  • Data protection rules on AI and automated decisions (ICO)
  • Consumer and competition law (CMA)
  • Sector rules, for example financial services (FCA)

Founder move

Track regulator guidance in your sector rather than waiting for a UK AI Act.

ICO · Guidance on AI and data protection
US · PrivacyPhasing in

California CCPA/CPRA & regulations

Regulations Jan 2026 · ADMT Jan 2027 · Risk assessment attestations Apr 2028

The most developed US state privacy regime, now with rules on automated decision-making, risk assessments and cybersecurity audits.

Applies to

For-profit businesses meeting revenue or data-volume thresholds that collect California residents’ personal information.

Key obligations

  • Notices, opt-outs of sale and sharing, and honouring opt-out preference signals
  • Risk assessments and, for some, cybersecurity audits
  • Pre-use notices, opt-outs and access rights for ADMT

Founder move

Treat California as your US baseline and layer other states on top.

California Privacy Protection Agency
US · PrivacyIn force

Other US state privacy laws

About 20 states · Indiana, Kentucky and Rhode Island from Jan 2026

A patchwork of comprehensive state privacy laws modelled broadly on Virginia’s, with differences in thresholds, sensitive data and minors.

Applies to

Businesses meeting each state’s thresholds for residents’ data; some, such as Texas, have no revenue threshold.

Key obligations

  • Privacy notices and consumer rights
  • Opt-in consent for sensitive data in most states
  • Data protection assessments for high-risk processing

Founder move

Build one rights and consent system that meets the strictest common denominator.

Fieldnote · The US state privacy patchwork
US · AIUncertain

Colorado AI Act (SB 26-189)

Effective 1 Jan 2027 · Enforcement stayed by federal court, Apr 2026

A rewritten state AI law focused on automated decisions in consequential areas, with notice, adverse-outcome and human-review duties.

Applies to

Developers and deployers of AI used for consequential decisions about Colorado consumers.

Key obligations

  • Advance notice of AI use in consequential decisions
  • Adverse-outcome explanations and human review
  • Recordkeeping and developer documentation

Founder move

Prepare the notices and review routes anyway; they are good practice under every ADM regime.

Briefing · Skadden on Colorado’s replacement AI Act
US · AIIn force

Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA)

Effective 1 Jan 2026

An intent-based AI law prohibiting specific harmful uses, with a regulatory sandbox and Attorney General enforcement.

Applies to

Developers and deployers doing business in Texas or whose AI is used by Texas residents.

Key obligations

  • No AI developed or deployed with intent to cause listed harms
  • Disclosure duties for government and healthcare uses
  • Cure periods and safe harbours tied to recognised frameworks

Founder move

Align your AI governance with NIST AI RMF to benefit from the safe harbours.

Briefing · Norton Rose Fulbright on TRAIGA
US · AIIn force

California AI laws (SB 53, AB 2013, SB 942)

SB 53 & AB 2013 Jan 2026 · SB 942 Aug 2026

Frontier-model safety frameworks and incident reporting, training-data transparency, and AI-content detection and disclosure.

Applies to

Large frontier developers (SB 53), developers of public generative AI (AB 2013) and large generative AI providers (SB 942).

Key obligations

  • Published safety frameworks and critical incident reporting (frontier developers)
  • Public summaries of training data
  • Free AI-detection tools and latent disclosures in generated content

Founder move

If you train or offer generative AI to Californians, prepare a training-data summary.

Briefing · Gunderson on 2026 AI laws
US · AIIn force

NYC Local Law 144 (automated hiring tools)

Enforced since 5 Jul 2023

Requires independent bias audits and candidate notices for automated employment decision tools used in New York City.

Applies to

Employers and employment agencies using automated tools to screen candidates or employees for NYC roles.

Key obligations

  • Annual independent bias audit, with a published summary
  • Notice to candidates before use
  • Information on data collected, on request

Founder move

HR-tech vendors should offer customers audit-ready documentation.

NYC DCWP · Automated employment decision tools
US · AIIn force

FTC Act Section 5 (AI & data enforcement)

Ongoing enforcement

The FTC polices unfair and deceptive practices, including false AI claims, data misuse and inadequate security.

Applies to

Most businesses operating in or targeting the US.

Key obligations

  • Substantiate claims about what your AI can do
  • Honour your privacy and security promises
  • Avoid unfair data practices; remedies can include deleting models

Founder move

Have evidence behind every AI and privacy claim on your website.

FTC · Artificial intelligence
US · PrivacyIn force

COPPA & amended COPPA Rule

Amended Rule effective Jun 2025 · Compliance by Apr 2026

Federal rules on collecting personal information from children under 13, updated with stricter consent and security requirements.

Applies to

Online services directed to children under 13, or with actual knowledge that they collect children’s data.

Key obligations

  • Verifiable parental consent before collection
  • Separate consent for disclosure to third parties, such as for targeted ads
  • Written security programme and data retention limits

Founder move

Check whether your audience makes you ‘directed to children’.

FTC · COPPA Rule
US · PlatformsIn force

TAKE IT DOWN Act

Signed May 2025 · Platform takedown duties from May 2026

Federal law criminalising non-consensual intimate imagery, including AI deepfakes, and requiring fast removal by platforms.

Applies to

Covered platforms hosting user-generated content.

Key obligations

  • Notice-and-removal process for intimate imagery
  • Removal within 48 hours of a valid request
  • Reasonable efforts to remove copies

Founder move

Generative and social platforms need a dedicated NCII takedown flow.

Congress.gov · S.146
US · PrivacyIn force

HIPAA

Long-standing · Security Rule update proposed

Federal privacy and security rules for protected health information held by healthcare entities and their business associates.

Applies to

Covered entities (providers, plans, clearinghouses) and vendors acting as business associates.

Key obligations

  • Business associate agreements
  • Privacy, security and breach notification rules
  • Minimum-necessary use and disclosure

Founder move

Health-tech startups: decide early whether you are a business associate.

HHS · HIPAA
US · AIUncertain

US federal AI policy & preemption push

EO 14365 Dec 2025 · DOJ task force Jan 2026 · No statutory preemption

There is no federal AI statute. An executive order created a DOJ task force to challenge state AI laws, and Congress has not enacted preemption.

Applies to

Indirectly, every company subject to state AI laws.

Key obligations

  • No new federal obligations by themselves
  • State AI laws remain in force unless a court rules otherwise
  • Federal procurement and agency guidance can still shape requirements

Founder move

Keep complying with state laws; an executive order cannot overturn a statute.

Briefing · Paul Hastings on the AI executive order
India · PrivacyPhasing in

Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 & Rules 2025

Rules notified Nov 2025 · Consent managers Nov 2026 · Core duties May 2027

India’s comprehensive data protection law, built around consent, notice, data principal rights and a Data Protection Board.

Applies to

Processing of digital personal data in India, and processing outside India connected with offering goods or services to people in India.

Key obligations

  • Itemised notice and consent, with easy withdrawal
  • Security safeguards and breach intimation
  • Verifiable parental consent for children; extra duties for SDFs

Founder move

Start consent and notice redesign now; penalties reach ₹250 crore.

MeitY · Data protection framework
India · PlatformsIn force

IT Act 2000 & IT Rules (incl. synthetic content)

Synthetic content amendments effective 20 Feb 2026

India’s core internet law and intermediary rules, now requiring labelling of AI-generated content and faster takedowns.

Applies to

Intermediaries and platforms serving users in India, with additional duties for significant social media intermediaries.

Key obligations

  • Due diligence and grievance redressal
  • Labels and provenance metadata for synthetic content
  • Takedown of unlawful content within tight timelines

Founder move

If users generate or share AI media in India, ship visible labels and metadata.

Briefing · Hogan Lovells on India’s AI labelling rules
India · AIGuidance

India AI Governance Guidelines

Released 5 Nov 2025

MeitY’s principles-based framework for AI. It relies on existing laws and voluntary measures rather than a standalone AI law.

Applies to

Organisations developing or deploying AI in India (non-binding).

Key obligations

  • Principles including trust, accountability, fairness and safety
  • Voluntary measures and techno-legal tools
  • Signals future targeted amendments, for example to the IT Act

Founder move

Use the guidelines to shape internal AI policy; watch for IT Act amendments.

Briefing · AZB & Partners on the AI governance guidelines
India · CyberIn force

CERT-In Directions 2022

Effective Jun 2022

Cybersecurity directions requiring rapid incident reporting and log retention by service providers and organisations in India.

Applies to

Service providers, intermediaries, data centres and body corporates, with extra duties for VPN, cloud and VDA providers.

Key obligations

  • Report specified cyber incidents within 6 hours
  • Retain ICT logs for 180 days within India
  • Synchronise clocks with Indian time servers

Founder move

Make sure your incident plan can hit a six-hour reporting clock.

CERT-In
India · CryptoIn force

India VDA rules (PMLA & tax)

Tax from 2022 · PMLA reporting entities since Mar 2023

India regulates crypto through tax and anti-money-laundering law rather than a dedicated statute.

Applies to

VDA service providers serving Indian users, including offshore platforms, and investors.

Key obligations

  • Register with FIU-IND and run KYC and suspicious-transaction reporting
  • 30% tax on VDA income and 1% TDS on transfers
  • Record-keeping under the PMLA

Founder move

Map your services to the five PMLA activity categories before onboarding Indian users.

FIU-IND
APAC · PrivacyIn force

China PIPL & Data Security Law

DSL Sep 2021 · PIPL Nov 2021 · Cross-border easing rules Mar 2024

China’s personal information and data security laws, with extraterritorial reach and strict cross-border transfer mechanisms.

Applies to

Processing in China, and processing abroad of personal information of people in China for products, services or analysis.

Key obligations

  • Consent-based processing with separate consent for sensitive data
  • CAC security assessment, standard contract or certification for exports
  • Local representative for offshore processors

Founder move

Decide early whether China users are in scope; transfer mechanisms take time.

DigiChina · PIPL translation
APAC · AIIn force

China generative AI & labelling rules

Generative AI Measures Aug 2023 · Labelling Measures 1 Sep 2025

Rules for public generative AI services in China, including security assessments, algorithm filing and mandatory AI-content labelling.

Applies to

Providers of generative AI services to the public in China, and content platforms distributing AI content.

Key obligations

  • Algorithm filing and security assessment for public services
  • Explicit and implicit (metadata) labels on AI-generated content
  • Training-data and content-governance duties

Founder move

Launching AI features in China is a separate regulatory project; plan for filing.

Briefing · Covington on China’s AI labelling rules
APAC · AIIn force

South Korea AI Basic Act

Effective 22 Jan 2026

A comprehensive AI framework law covering high-impact AI, generative AI transparency and support for the AI industry.

Applies to

AI businesses whose services affect the Korean market, including some foreign providers.

Key obligations

  • Notice and labelling for generative AI outputs
  • Risk management for high-impact AI
  • A domestic representative for qualifying foreign providers

Founder move

Check whether your Korean user base triggers the local representative duty.

Briefing · Cooley on the AI Basic Act
APAC · AIIn force

Japan AI Promotion Act

Passed May 2025 · Fully in force 1 Sep 2025

A promotion-first framework law that creates an AI Strategy Headquarters and a basic plan, relying on cooperation rather than penalties.

Applies to

AI developers and users in Japan, through cooperation duties and government guidance.

Key obligations

  • Cooperate with government measures and investigations
  • Follow sector guidance and the AI basic plan
  • Existing laws (APPI, copyright, consumer) still apply

Founder move

Japan is AI-friendly, but check APPI and copyright rules for training data.

CSIS · Japan’s AI governance
APAC · PrivacyIn force

Japan APPI

Major amendments 2022

Japan’s personal information law, with an EU adequacy finding and rules on third-party provision and cross-border transfers.

Applies to

Businesses handling personal information of people in Japan, including foreign businesses.

Key obligations

  • Purpose specification and notice
  • Consent or safeguards for third-party and overseas transfers
  • Breach reporting to the PPC

Founder move

Use the EU–Japan adequacy arrangement to simplify data flows.

Personal Information Protection Commission
APAC · PrivacyIn force

Singapore PDPA & AI governance frameworks

PDPA amended 2020 · GenAI governance framework 2024

Singapore’s data protection law, paired with voluntary AI governance frameworks and testing tools (AI Verify).

Applies to

Organisations collecting or using personal data in Singapore; AI frameworks are voluntary.

Key obligations

  • Consent, purpose limitation and notification
  • Mandatory breach notification
  • Voluntary AI governance and testing

Founder move

Singapore is a strong APAC base; align with its AI frameworks for regional trust.

PDPC Singapore
APAC · PrivacyPhasing in

Australia Privacy Act reforms & social media minimum age

Tranche 1 Dec 2024 · Statutory tort Jun 2025 · Under-16 social media ban Dec 2025 · ADM transparency Dec 2026

First-tranche privacy reforms added a privacy tort, stronger enforcement and automated-decision transparency; a second tranche is in draft.

Applies to

APP entities handling personal information of Australians; age-restricted social platforms for the minimum age law.

Key obligations

  • Disclose automated decisions in privacy policies
  • Stronger penalties and OAIC enforcement
  • Reasonable steps to keep under-16s off age-restricted platforms

Founder move

Update privacy policies for automated decisions before December 2026.

OAIC
Middle East · PrivacyIn force

Saudi Arabia PDPL

Enforceable since 14 Sep 2024

Saudi Arabia’s comprehensive data protection law, enforced by SDAIA, with registration and transfer rules.

Applies to

Processing of personal data in the Kingdom, including by entities outside it processing residents’ data.

Key obligations

  • Lawful basis, notices and data subject rights
  • Breach notification to SDAIA
  • Conditions on transfers outside the Kingdom

Founder move

Saudi expansion needs its own privacy workstream, not a copy of your GDPR pack.

Briefing · IAPP on the PDPL’s first year
Middle East · PrivacyUncertain

UAE PDPL & free-zone laws (DIFC, ADGM)

Federal law in force Jan 2022 · Status of executive regulations contested

A federal data protection law alongside separate, GDPR-style regimes in the DIFC and ADGM financial free zones, where DIFC also regulates autonomous systems.

Applies to

Processing in the UAE; free-zone entities follow their own laws.

Key obligations

  • Consent and transparency under the federal law
  • Free-zone registration, DPO and transfer rules
  • DIFC rules for processing through AI and autonomous systems

Founder move

Pick your UAE entity structure with data protection in mind; the regimes differ.

DIFC (Dubai International Financial Centre)
Middle East · CryptoIn force

UAE virtual-asset regimes (VARA and others)

Dubai VARA regime since 2023

Dedicated licensing for virtual-asset service providers in Dubai, with parallel regimes in the free zones.

Applies to

VASPs operating in or from the UAE.

Key obligations

  • Licence before offering virtual-asset activities
  • Rulebooks on custody, marketing and compliance
  • AML and Travel Rule compliance

Founder move

Choose the regulator (VARA, ADGM, DIFC) based on your activities; coordinate with local counsel.

Dubai VARA
Americas · PrivacyIn force

Brazil LGPD

In force Sep 2020 · Sanctions since Aug 2021

Brazil’s GDPR-style data protection law, enforced by the ANPD, with extraterritorial reach and transfer rules.

Applies to

Processing in Brazil, or of data of people in Brazil, or to offer goods and services there.

Key obligations

  • Legal bases including legitimate interest
  • A DPO (encarregado) and incident reporting
  • Standard contractual clauses for international transfers

Founder move

LatAm launch? Start with LGPD; it is the region’s reference law.

ANPD (Brazil)
Americas · AIPending

Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023)

Senate passed Dec 2024 · Awaiting Chamber committee report

A risk-based AI bill similar in shape to the EU AI Act, still pending in the Chamber of Deputies.

Applies to

Would apply to AI developers and deployers in Brazil if enacted.

Key obligations

  • Risk classification and high-risk duties (proposed)
  • Rights for people affected by AI (proposed)
  • Copyright remuneration for training data (proposed)

Founder move

Watch, don’t build for it yet; the text may change before enactment.

Briefing · Barbieri on Brazil’s AI bill
Americas · PrivacyIn force

Canada PIPEDA & Québec Law 25

Québec Law 25 fully in force Sep 2024 · Federal AI bill (AIDA) lapsed Jan 2025

Federal private-sector privacy law plus Québec’s stricter regime, which adds privacy impact assessments and automated-decision transparency.

Applies to

Organisations collecting personal information in commercial activity in Canada; Québec Law 25 for Québec residents.

Key obligations

  • Meaningful consent and accountability
  • Privacy impact assessments, including before transfers outside Québec
  • Notice of decisions based exclusively on automated processing (Québec)

Founder move

Treat Québec as the strict baseline for Canadian launches.

Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
International · AIPending

Council of Europe AI Convention

Opened Sep 2024 · EU ratified May 2026 · Not yet in force

The first binding international AI treaty, focused on human rights, democracy and the rule of law across the AI lifecycle.

Applies to

States that ratify, which then apply it through national law.

Key obligations

  • Risk and impact management for AI
  • Transparency and remedies for affected people
  • Requires five ratifications, including three Council of Europe members

Founder move

No direct duties yet; it signals where national AI laws are heading.

Council of Europe · EU ratification
International · AIGuidance

OECD AI Principles & G7 Hiroshima Code

OECD Principles 2019, updated 2024 · Hiroshima Code of Conduct 2023

Intergovernmental soft law that underpins many national AI frameworks, plus a voluntary code for advanced AI developers.

Applies to

Voluntary; widely referenced in procurement and policy.

Key obligations

  • Trustworthy AI principles: transparency, robustness, accountability
  • Risk identification and mitigation for advanced AI
  • Voluntary reporting under the Hiroshima framework

Founder move

Map your AI policy to these principles; buyers and regulators recognise them.

OECD.AI · AI Principles
International · CryptoIn force

FATF standards & the crypto Travel Rule

Recommendation 16 applied to VASPs since 2019 · EU Travel Rule Dec 2024

Global anti-money-laundering standards that national regimes implement, including the Travel Rule for crypto transfers.

Applies to

Virtual-asset service providers, through national AML laws.

Key obligations

  • Customer due diligence and monitoring
  • Originator and beneficiary information with transfers
  • Licensing or registration of VASPs

Founder move

Choose Travel Rule tooling that interoperates across your markets.

FATF · Virtual assets
International · AIGuidance

NIST AI RMF & ISO/IEC 42001

NIST AI RMF 2023 · ISO/IEC 42001 2023

The two most-used AI governance frameworks: NIST’s voluntary risk framework and the certifiable ISO AI management system standard.

Applies to

Voluntary; increasingly expected by enterprise buyers and referenced in laws such as TRAIGA.

Key obligations

  • Govern, Map, Measure and Manage AI risk (NIST)
  • AI management system, roles and controls (ISO 42001)
  • Evidence for procurement and audits

Founder move

Use these as the backbone of your AI governance; they travel across jurisdictions.

NIST · AI Risk Management Framework

Reviewed 12 October 2026. Summaries are simplified for orientation and draw on official texts and law-firm briefings. Status and dates can change, and some depend on further rulemaking or litigation. This is general information, not legal advice. For the deadlines, see the regulatory radar.

Ready when you are

Not sure which of these apply to your product?

Tell me what you’re building. I’ll tell you what you need. No obligation.

Book an intro call